I’m starting another of my real-time reviews on this page, i.e. of "ALL GOD'S ANGELS, BEWARE!" by Quentin S. Crisp (Ex Occidente Press 2009). I shall attempt to draw out all the fiction's leitmotifs and mould them into a gestalt.
I anticipate this being a delightfully slow-sipped journey through this mightily filled and exquisitely honed book. The process may therefore entail days or even weeks between additions below.
EDIT: CAVEAT (24 OCT 09 - one hour after writing the review for 'Ynys-y-Plag' below): There may be inadvertent spoilers. You may wish (i) to take that risk and read my review as the items are posted below, before or during or after your own reading of the book, or (ii) to wait until you have finished reading the book. In either case, I hope it gives a useful or interesting perspective.
All my real-time reviews are linked from here: http://weirdmonger.blog-city.com/recent_reviews_of_books_by_dfl.htm

Troubled Joe
"...I thought I might as well do a bit of concentrated haunting on this spot just for my own sake."
The language flows limpidly as if from some meaningful source or fount of the future. The omens are good for me as, today, I start reading this long-anticipated book - having recently been considering, for 'Cern Zoo' purposes, the latest news that the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland is sabotaging itself from the future or, as some have said, committing suicide in self-retrospect. This story's themes include what it calls 'retrocausality' in a very similar vein.
The plot flows as beautifully as the language that tells it. I really should have read more QSC before today! The narrator is a ghost (of Troubled Joe) and it is a staggeringly original treatment of such a consciousness trying to find its own 'source' of being or hindsight explication, by a form of confessional with those it haunts, sometimes almost with tactile or even sexual frisson. It is a story of some length and I cannot do justice to the relentless power of concept and emotion, leading to a fatal and seemingly spiteful ricochet that this ghost 'causes' or ignites between two realities, and one wonders whether assisted death (assisted by whomsoever) is an act of despair or hope. The truth, perhaps, it's neither. We all shall see, no doubt. (23 Oct 09)
The Were-Sheep of Abercrave
Well, I'm seriously Half-Welsh...and this story is absurdly half-something else.
It starts off as a tale of a Black Path in the Welsh countryside along which the narrator wends his way towards a structure called the Round House, presenting an ambiance that has a strong 'genius loci' amid the start of a compelling plot-thread of 'weird fiction' in the sanest sense of that genre. It then changes somewhat suddenly, somewhat gradually (I'm significantly uncertain which) into its own "piecemeal effigy", as if there are tufts of morling* wool snagged on the letters themselves.
It does not exactly become an avant garde art installation but, rather, a narrative that, by being even weirder than the weirdest imaginable 'ready-made' in the Tate Modern, begins to assume a degree of empathisable sense that the story itself calls "non-human thought". It's as if the reader loses bits of himself and gains other bits (both physical and mental bits) in a sort of Consequences game before following his (the reader's) own personalised Black Path - meeting, inter alios, Elvis Presley, Darth Vader and William Blake along the way. I, of course, cannot evaluate the whole of this story, being Half-Welsh.
*morling wool is shaved off a dead sheep, shorling wool from a live one. (23 Oct 09 - five hours later)
And now of substantial novella length:
Ynys-y-Plag
Part I
"I suppose I shall be accused of employing the pathetic fallacy but, then, the true fallacy is to believe that inanimate things have no mood or spirit of their own..."
A notable photographer - in a hybrid WG Sebald / Lovecraft and geographical-synaesthesia mood with an element of something that seems generally endemic as 'photographer's angst' or paranoia when photographing, say, children as an inadvertent part of his art as much as when photographing a tea-bag in an ashtray - seems to be starting a journey with us explaining connections with his famous book of photographs ('Traces') with no thought for the Intentional Fallacy! I feel very much in tune with the strong and realistically unsettling sense of place and with this narrator as he chooses this (to him, unknown) Welsh area of Ynys-y-Plag with a preliminary random pin on the map for his photographing trip (much as I chose Clun for my honeymoon in 1970) after he briefly mentioned Braintree (where we have friends not far from where I live now, i.e. in Essex). I also feel very much in tune with his approach to a tree at the tail end of Part I where he finds a swing and a tiny white sock like a maggot. I only hope my current chest infection does not dare to prevent me from reading further or from approaching the 'tree' that is this book. Heart in mouth, I approach this novella in the same way because it promises to be something truly special in my long life of reading literature. And I say that advisedly. (24 Oct 09)
Part II
"I stalled here because I realised I did not actually know what he had told me, at least, not so that I could paraphrase it."
Indeed, I share that danger with the narrator of re-telling the story by means of this 'review'. I will not, can not do so. But here we have concerns of photographic light related to pre-Raphaelite twlight, the narrator's chance brief conversation with the 'Otter Man', his landlady at his lodgings who seems to be worried for his welfare by coming in so late in the evening for his dinner, all the paths seeming to lead to bridges one of which is due to become one of his most famous photographs with a child's shoe nearby, manholes in the countrified ground, and a 'bug' that I don't think can be likened to my current chest infection (or I hope not!). I merely say that my awe-struck anticipation for this highly atmospheric novella is growing even greater. And, in hindsight (by retrocausality?), I wish to replace 'Lovecraft' above with Sarban and Algernon Blackwood. WG Sebald may stay, however.
"The stranger I fear in others is also the stranger I fear in myself." (24 Oct 09 - ninety minutes later)
Part III
"If you saw something strange it was best to look the other way, walk on, and, if possible, forget it."
Bugs are illnesses as well as things we project into our life's technical paraphernalia to explain their shortcomings, the text at some point states. But now the reader is given the paraphrase of a paraphrase that, in turn, also paraphrases. The desolate area of the bug (or 'bwg') where the 'swing' swings is thus fleshed out with some perspective of and from the past by such effective means. One of the paraphrase's protagonists ended up perpetutaing the 'bug' in herself. I know several people in real life who have surely touched their own 'bug'. But this girl is or was due to suffer "mental backwardness", a supposed condition which takes on a whole panoply of meaning in the context. Meanwhile, I am careful here not to plant spoilers. But who knows how many spoilers plant themselves? Or will do so? (24 Oct 09 - another 2 hours later)
Part IV
"You can judge for yourself how well I did, by turning the pages and comparing 'Traces I' with 'Traces II'"
The narrator now has a seeming antagonistic companion called Rhodri provided by the dubious landlady for apparent fear of his photographing at twilight alone. Seeming, apparent... We now enter the dark zones of this story and Sarban, Blackwood, Sebald &c have by now abandoned us and we are joined instead by some head-lease or freehold author (whether QSC himself or someone else, I cannot say) to accompany the photographer-narrator in a different manner from someone 'real' like Rhodri. And together we all visit the aforementioned woman of "mental backwardness". Some of the ensuing events are shocking, even disappointingly strident by over-implication. I am not sure who's the constructively craziest of them all? Me or you for submitting ourselves to this story? Or those who put the 'bug' into the reading-text in the first place for us to catch? All I can say is that the language remains impeccable, the shocks heartfelt and the horror immediate but also subtly retroactive in possibly increasing measure. I sense and hope that the final part as yet to be read will be a calm coda of some sort. (24 Oct 09 - another 2 hours later)
Part V
A perfect ending. It is as if the Narrator sees something now in his Narration which is not entirely his, because he has become a different person (mentally and physically, cf: 'The Were-Sheep of Abercrave'), different to what he was when within that very Narration. This is intrinsic to reading fiction and suspension of disbelief and 'becoming' (living through) the character himself. The photographs, too, become - in his subsequently successsful book 'Traces' - beyond his own 'intentions', some possibly perpetrated by Rhodri with his camera when he wasn't looking, i.e. with fleeting images within the negatives (or 'dark zones') that bring back his 'photographer's angst' and paranoia... We also spot such images among the text, in a similar fashion. We, too, as readers, have become different. It's as if we have submitted ourselves to a rite-of-passage for real and beyond ourselves. We were hysterical, but now calm. We just need to watch behind us in case the text was indeed catching. Or will be. (24 Oct 09 - another 2 hours later).
.
And now another of substantial novella length:
Karakasa
Unlike 'Ynys-y-Plag', this is not divided into formal Parts. Therefore, in advance, I intend to read and review this in three convenient parts (I: pages 135 - 159, II: pages 159 - 181 & III: pages 181 - 202). (24 Oct 09 - another hour later)
"This would mean I stopped being myself in my mid-twenties."
Part I
"...but the thing that really did for England was the urban rhizome." (24 Oct 09 - another 4 hours later British Summer Time)
This novella is not in itself like 'House of Leaves' but, as reader, I feel I'm exploring the acual text and urtext as if I'm exploring something like exploring the 'House of Leaves' but my Mary Poppins opened-umbrella hinders my progress, assists my clumsy attempts to become even clumsier to fully apppreciate what I am exploring so far. It is a stunning monologue, at times old-fashioned like May Sinclair's Heaven stories, at others original and breath-taking, science-fictional or apocalyptic, both a painting and cinematic film, a printed novella and a waking dream you had yourself, a cartoon or a tsunami of images relating to death / life - mortality / immortality - architecture / dream - reality / unreality - England / Japan - homelessness / security - self / selflessness. The language is all-enveloping and flows sweetly and takes you on a fabricated journey to you know not where. Fabricated on the hoof, while tightly pre-destined. There are just hints of things, Kadath, Nabokovian turns of phrase....and things that are more obvious all swirling you, as reader, onward. Someone yesterday criticised my real-time reviews as being un-academic and full of spoilers, i.e. with particular reference to this current one. OK. Hence the added 'caveat' above. All I can say is: "All God's Angels, Beware!" Most of the stuff I 'review' can't actually be spoiled because it is the reading experience that counts not the enjoyment of any plot possibility being tripped up by a careless unofficial denouement. This novella, so far, is a spoiler in itself. But only a spoiler for those who never get round to reading it. It will just be there, out there, precarious and tantalising, and the person who did not read it will be nowhere. (25 Oct 09 - 8.10 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time)
Part II
"It occurred to me, with the force of inspiration, that I should take holographs of myself at set intervals, if possible in the same position, at the same time of day, against the same backround."
...similarly with photographs in 'Traces' earlier. And a Brainbook as the new Braintree.
The journey (my umbrella lost) through a reality-rarified Japan continues with thoughts concerning the wriggle-room, I infer, at the cusp of mortality and immortality ... longevity as a determinant of regard or disregard, love or sex as a potential nuisance neighbour, CGI as a 'stone age' mummery and Time almost literally like wind and weather. Then a philosophical dialogue, but which one is Socrates? Plus still all the wonderful ingredients I've already covered above for Part I. A rose tree that reminds me of my own father's rose tree and plaque in the crematorium grounds and an appointment I may need to keep.
Keep taking the medicine, I say. I need Part III not only to be read, but written.
"...like looking at the moon after seeing someone leapfrog over it, but knowing that for me the moon was still the moon." (25 Oct 09 - five hours later)
Part III
"If it was raining, or if there was danger of rain, she would usually remind me to take an umbrella."
Well, it would only too easily now to fall into spoiler territory, with a (for me) surprising finale that is, inter alia, relevant to the unChristian belief that icons hold the soul of he or she or it they iconise. Indeed, in the Hundred Year Museum there are many ready-mades on a production-line of Time. This is an amazing novella, there can be no mistake - one that is remarkable and original and beautifully, mellifluously languaged, containing much of what I have already hinted at above and much much more. It is glib to say something is life-changing. But this must surely edge towards such a claim, at least.
"It was the gutter of history, that flows into the sewer of the forgotten, and inhaling this smoke had been like drinking from that gutter." Some may know from what I've said before in this review that I currently have a bad cough. I coughed while reading that sentence, but the cough seemed to take on ((de)generate into) a tail-end language of its own 'inspired' by this novella. My wife in the room heard it. I told her that that cough had been a Japanese cough. She laughed.
"My hair had become entirely grey on that side..." Cf. the photographer of 'Traces'. I am left with one question: can ruins be ruined? (25 Oct 09 - another 2 hours later).
THIS REVIEW IS NOW CONTINUED HERE: http://weirdmonger.livejournal.com/117628.html